Interpretive Inconsistencies in the Issue of Political Alignment With the Proposed International Measures to Combat Climate Change
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54481/Keywords:
environment, climate change, scientific assessment, weather modification, alternative perspectives, international policiesAbstract
The causes of environmental problems are highlighted by the discrepancies between the official positions of international institutions and alternative, often marginalized, views. The predominant funding of a single environmental ideology limits the ability of actors in administration, civil society, education and the media to express different perspectives in relation to state responses to climate change. This situation raises questions about the absence of relevant factors that could influence the environment, in addition to anthropogenic emissions. Analysis of weather modification technologies and environmental policies suggests the need for a new approach to environmental protection. Independent, rigorous scientific assessment and legal regulation of climate technologies and fluctuations in solar activity — are essential to promoting balanced models of sustainability and sustainability. In this framework, the strategic importance of not perpetuating a monopolistic vision of environmental issues is highlighted, because the exclusion of alternative scientific perspectives from global climate debates can lead to ineffective policies and international conflicts new in structure and nature.
References
1 NASA: The Atmosphere - Getting a Handle on Carbon Dioxide. https://science.nasa.gov/earth/climatechange/greenhouse-gases/the-atmosphere-getting-a-handle-on-carbon-dioxide/ [Accesat la 23.03.2024]
2 Feynman, R. P. (2009). The meaning of it all: Thoughts of a citizen-scientist. Basic Books.
3 Harper, W., Lindzen, R. Comment and Declaration on the SEC Proposed Rule "The enhancement and standardization of climate-related disclosures for investors" File No. S7-10-22, 87 Fed. Reg. 21334, 2022.
4 USA Securities and Exchange Commission: The enhancement and standardization of climaterelated disclosures for investors. https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/2024/03/s7-10-22 [Accesat la 22.03.2024]
5 Harper, W., Lindzen, R., Op. cit.
6 European Commission Climate Action: Climate Change, 2015. ISBN 978-92-79-52756-2 https://climate.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2016-11/factsheet_climate_change_2015_en.pdf [Accesat la 20.03.2024]
7 Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2022). European Union policies and their role in combating climate change over the years. In: Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 15(8), 1333-1340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-022-01156-5
8 Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S. A., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R. & Skuce, A. (2013). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. In: Environmental research letters, 8(2), 024024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024
9 Tol, R. S. (2014). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the literature: A re-analysis. In: Energy Policy, 73, 701-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.045
10 United Nations Summit of the future. Outcome documents: Pact for the Future, Global Digital Compact and Declaration on Future Generations https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/sotf-pact_for_the_future_adopted.pdf [Accesat la 24.03.2024]
11 IPCC 1990: Houghton, J. T., Jenkins, J. G., Ephraums, J. J. (1990). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Chance Scientific Assessment (p. 6-414). Cambridge University Press.
12 IPCC 2001: Houghton, J. T., Albritton, D. L., Allen, M. R., Baede, A. P. M., Church, J. A., Cubasch, U. & Zillman, J. (2001). Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contributions of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (p. 1-20). Cambridge University Press.
13 Easterbrook J. Evidence-based climate science. Second Edition, 2016. ISBN 978-0-12-804588-6
14 Wanner, H., Pfister, C., & Neukom, R. (2022). The variable European little ice age. In: Quaternary Science Reviews, 287, 107531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107531
